Insights from the Mahabharata – Krishna & Karna

–          In any ordinary story it is inconceivable, that at one time the ‘hero’ is treated like the ‘villain’ or the ‘villain’ treated like a ‘hero.’

–          Alas, The Mahabharata is no ordinary ‘story’ per se.  It is an ‘Irony,’ or as some appropriately call it Krishna’s ‘Swan Song, ‘and most importantly historical fact.

–          Krishna is the sole actor & everyone else is indeed his pawn/puppet

–          Everything perishes in this epic, except for the Gita.

–          Now some may ask why write about Krishna & Karna?

–          It is because; Krishna is the thread that runs through the Mahabharata along with his alter egos, ‘Vyasa Dev’ & Arjuna.

–          Without Karna by his side, Duryodhana would not have waged war against the Pandavas. As there would be no answer to the ‘Wielder of the Gandiva Bow’ – Prince Arjun

–          As we shall see, something more links Krishna & Karna

–          In the words of my Guru, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar :

–          Maha = Great, Bharat = Brilliance, Gita = Song/Harmony, War = Disharmony

–          ‘The Great Brilliance of Life is having Disharmony (Warring Pandavas-Kurus) all around you, but being able to keep the Harmony within (Krishna gives the Gita to Arjun in the middle of the battlefield between the 2 armies)

 

Scene from the MahaBharat War:

Karna attaches an arrow to his bow, pulls back and releases – the arrow is aimed at Arjun’s heart.  Krishna, Arjun’s Charioteer, drives by sheer force the chariot into the ground several feet.  The arrow hits Arjun’s headgear and knocks it off. Missing its target – Arjuna’s heart.

Krishna yells, “Wow! Nice shot, Karna.”

Arjuna asks Krishna, ‘Why are you praising Karna?’

Krishna tells Arjun, ‘Look at you! You have Lord Hanuman on the flag of this chariot. You have me as your charioteer. You received the blessings of Ma Durga and your Guru, Dronacharya before the battle, have a loving Mother and an aristocratic heritage. This Karna has nobody, his own charioteer, Salya belittles him, his own Guru (Parusurama) cursed him, his Mother abandoned him when he was born and he has no known heritage.  Yet, look at the battle he’s giving you. Without me and Lord Hanuman on this chariot, where would you be?’

 

This is a question that is fit for every one of us. ‘Where would you be?’  Where would anyone of us be without God’s grace? We are not the doer. So, when Arjun is upset because of Krishna’s praise of Karna – Krishna reminds him that he is not the doer.  One way or another, Krishna removed all of Arjuna’s obstacles throughout his life.  Krishna, via Dronacharya, eliminated Ekalavya as a future threat.  Krishna, via Indra, made Karna give up his golden impenetrable armor.  Krishna, via Ghatocatcha(Bhima’s Son), made Karna use his deadly dart reserved for Arjuna. To Which Krishna laughed and laughed. When asked why he was laughing by Arjuna. Krishna said, one minute ago – Karna could not be defeated even by the Gods, but, right now he has become human for the first time.  Prior to that, Krishna would drive the chariot in such a way as to avoid Karna’s side of the field. 

Whereas, all of Arjuna’s obstacles were removed one by one – Karna’s odds were stacked against him one by one.                 

 

                                              Krishna/Karna

 

–          Immediately after Krishna’s birth, he was transported across the river by his father, Vasudeva to be brought up by his step-parents – Nanda & Yasoda

–          Immediately after Karna’s birth, his Mother – Kunti placed him in a basket on the river. He was transported to his step-parents – Adhiratha & Radha – by the watchful eye of his father, Surya Dev

 

–          Karna’s given name was – Vasusena

–          Krishna was also called – Vasudeva

 

–          Krishna’s mother was Devaki, his Step-Mother – Yasoda, His Chief Wife – Rukmini, yet he is remembered mostly for his lila with Radha. ‘Radha-Krishna’

–          Karna’s birth mother was Kunti, and even after finding out she was his mother – He told Krishna that he will not be called – Kaunteya – son of Kunti, but will be remembered as Radheya – Son of Radha. Till date, the Mahabharata refers to Karna as ‘Radheya’

 

–          Karna’s prowess was most feared by the Pandavas

–          Krishna’s presence was most feared by the Kurus

 

–          Krishna was asked by his people – Yadavas- to become, King. Krishna refused and Ugrasena was King of the Yadavas.

–          Krishna asked Karna to become Emperor of India (BharataVarsha- Extending to Pakistan, Bangladesh & Afghanistan at the time), thereby preventing the MahaBharat War.  Krishna argued that Karna being elder to both Yudhisthira & Duryodhana – he would be the rightful heir to the throne. Karna refused the Kingdom on account of principle

 

–          Krishna/Karna were both looked upon as ‘Outsiders’ in the Mahabharat war

 

–          Krishna/Karna were often pre-judged and ridiculed by others. Krishna as a ‘Cowherd’ and Karna belonging to the ‘Suta’ caste

 

–          Krishna/Karna exhibited 100% loyalty to Arjuna/Duryodhana respectively

 

–          Karna made a vow not to fight in the Mahabharat War as long as Bhishma Dev was on the field (Bhishma Dev had disrespected Karna numerous times and Karna had enough. They say that Bhishma did this purposely as he did not want to see the two brothers – Karna/Arjun fight each other. As he was their Grandfather.)

–          Krishna broke his vow of not picking up a weapon during the War, when he impulsively rushed at Bhishma Dev with his Chakra

 

–          Krishna/Karna never sought titles, wealth or accolades of praise. Both were extremely generous to their family and friends

 

–          Krishna vowed to Kunti that all 5 Pandavas were under his protection

–          Karna vowed to Kunti that he would spare the lives of 4 Pandavas and battle Arjuna (In the War, Karna had a chance to kill – Yudhisthira, Bhima, Nakula & Sahadeva at different intervals. Yet, he spared their lives)

 

–          Krishna was born in the Kshatriya caste, yet he played the role of Arjuna’s charioteer in the War

–          Karna was raised in the Suta (Charioteer) caste, yet he played the role of a Kshatriya in the War

 

–          When Yudhisthira found out the truth about Karna’s heritage after he died and that he was his elder brother – Yudhisthira wanted to give up the Kingdom to Bhima and retire to the forest.  All the Pandavas mourned deeply at Karna’s fate

–          When Yudhisthira found out that Krishna had left the world and Dwaraka had sunk into the sea, he gave up his Kingdom to Pariskhit & the Pandavas mourned deeply.  The Pandavas retired thereafter

 

–          Krishna/Karna both wanted Yudhisthira to become Emperor. Karna called Yudhisthira the embodiment of ‘Truth’ and that he deserved the Kingdom

 

–          Karna was cursed to his Death by his Guru – Rishi Parusharam for deceiving him for being a Brahmin (In actuality, Parusharam knew about Karna’s true heritage – however, he also knew the big picture that was to be played out later. Aside from that – along w/ Bhishma Dev, Karna was his favorite disciple)

–          Krishna was cursed to his Death by Gandhari as she felt he allowed the War to unfold and could have done more to prevent it.

 

–          Draupadi called Krishna her Sakha (Brother) & loved him openly. (Raksha-Bandha supposedly came from Draupadi-Krishna.  Krishna cut his finger from the Sudarshan Chakra and Draupadi immediately tore a piece of cloth from her favorite sari that she was wearing, soaked it in water and  rapidly wrapped it around his finger to stop the bleeding. When Krishna said, ‘That is your favorite Sari!’. Draupadi smiled and shrugged her shoulders as if it was no big deal. Krishna was touched by this – hence when she was being stripped by Dushashana in the Assembly Hall – Krishna by his maya supplied Draupadi with never ending Saris.)

–          Draupadi loved Karna secretly. He was her hidden crush. Karna along with Duryodhana asked Dushashana to strip  Draupadi of her sari in the Assembly Hall.  Which Krishna replenished one by one (Bhima had once told Yudhisthira, ‘Brother, do not give Krishna your sins. He multiplies everything.’)

 

–          Prior to the War, Krishna was looked upon with great respect and reverence.  Even among the Yadavas, they knew Krishna was great, nay The Greatest…yet, they didn’t know his Divinity.  Very few knew for sure who Krishna was.

–          After the War, many Rishis and people were angry with Krishna as they felt he could have prevented the atrocity and millions of deaths.

–          Prior to the War, Karna was looked upon as an instigator and right-hand man of Duryodhana – jealous of the Pandavas

–          After the war, Karna was looked upon with reverence by the Pandavas, Dhritarashtra & Gandhari. For his endless sacrifice & they were all sad that Karna had to face such ignonimity his whole life

 

–          By Birth, Karna had a closer relationship to Arjuna (Brothers) than Krishna had with Arjuna (Cousins)

–          But Spiritually, Krishna-Arjuna are the closest. They were the ancient twin Rishis same souled – Nara & Narayana

–          Krishna/Karna had an enormous amount of respect for each other.  Karna somehow knew about Krishna’s divinity and surrendered himself to his Lila.  Whereas, Karna surrendered to Krishna & gained glory – Ashwattama could not accept the manner in which his father, Dronacharya was slayed and unleashed a vicious guerrilla warfare against the Panchalas – men, women & children. Ending up being a bigger villain than Duryodhana

 

–          Krishna asked Karna how he knew the Pandavas would Win the MahaBharat War.  To which Karna responded, ‘Kurukshethra is a sacrificial field. Arjuna is the Head Priest, You-Krishna are the presiding deity. Myself (Karna), Bhishma Dev, Dronacharya and Duryodhana are the sacrifice.’

–          Krishna/Karna both sacrificed their lives for the Pandavas

–          Krishna ended their conversation by telling Karna, ‘You are the best of the Pandavas.’

–          The last tidbit is this, all the letters of K-A-R-N-A are in the word KRISHNA.

–          KARNA is the creation of Krishna to show the world the true meaning of sacrifice and to accept your fate. And in spite of all the bad luck or bad times you come across maintain: Your Spirituality, Your Generosity, Your Nobility, Your Dignity and Your Self- Respect and Respect for others.

–          The most telling aspect of Karna’s character comes when Sri Krishna offers him the Emperorship of India – and without so much of a blink of an eye – Karna turns it down as a matter of principle.

–          Karna tells Krishna, “What am I to do with the Throne? Am I to die of old age on a Throne? No, my death will be on the battlefield like a true Warrior.  There is no Glory, being King – there is Glory dying a Hero’s death – I am after Glory, not the Throne or Gold.”

–          Karna proceeds to tell Krishna, “Do not give me anything.  Whatever, I get I will give to Duryodhana.  If you give me the Kingdom, I will give it to Duryodhana. So, please don’t offer me that, as Yudhisthira deserves the Kingdom. He is fit to be the Emperor of Bharata as the very embodiment of Truth. The Pandavas are under your protection, they will Win the War.”

–          It is said that at Draupadi’s Swayamvara (The most skilled Warrior Wins the Princess as his Wife) if Karna had Won Draupadi’s hand – he would have given her to Duryodhana.

–          Krishna/Karna – Everything they did they did for others, not for themselves. Two selfless souls always acting for the betterment for others, while needing nothing themselves is Freedom. 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Insights from the Mahabharata – Krishna & Karna

  1. Niraj says:

    Respected Sir
    No offence meant . Please tell me the source of this Karna vs arjuna battle and Krishna praising karna. Or if some saint eg chaitanya mahaprabhu mentioned it or some sage whose name is mentioned in the Vedas or our holy epics puraans etc. The first man to translate Mahabharata from Sanskrit to English was Professor .K.M Ganguly and in his translation this incident is not mentioned although org Mahabharata has its share of Krishna praising karna ie especially at the end of the battle when arjunas chariot blew up to smithereens under the impact of karnas missiles.

  2. Ratnesh says:

    Some points-
    1. Mahabhat is very debatable and many interpretations are possible. It may be a story also.
    2. Kauravs were also sons of God Shiva with bloodline of kurus.
    3. Duryodhan was rightful owner of the throne being eldest son of rightful owner of elder dhiratarastra.
    4.Nothing negative is written in Mahabharat about the behaviour of kauravs towards general public. Infact kauravs – Duryodhan never pestered the general public.
    5. Duryodhan try to poision bhim because pandavas also use to ill treat kauravs especially bhim during childhood.
    6. Krishna, kunti and draupadi were the root cause of the war. Kunti hide about karna while draupadi was very arrogant and intervened in administration for wrong .
    7. krishna might be a God or not but krishna also had done many wrong deeds but these deed were termed as his leela because many wrong deeds are ignored for the powerful persons. Krishna was a good politician and orator. He was expert in persuading others what he wanted due to his communicating skills and wrong arguments.
    8. Pandavas had also done many wrong deeds but were ignored due to their powerful position. They were totally wrong in marrying draupadi.
    9. Mahabharat is all about acquiring the throne. It is a domestic struggle only between Kauravs and pandavas.Both of them were bonded to maya….so no question of dharam or adharam.
    10. In the end it was all about fate.All deeds of persons are governed by god and are predecided. So no one is to blame. Shishupal ill treated krishna because he had to die by krishna that it was predecided. In the same way draupadi was born for humillation thats why she was married to five persons and was humillated by kauravs. It was predecided. So no one to blame.
    Lastly, its all about our point of view. Any body can be wrong or right. Nobody was there to testify it. It can be a story also.

    • Pravin mishra says:

      U r really mad ….don’t now anything about mahabharat and is trying to fool us….duryodhan was not the rightful person of the crown become dhristrastra was made the king only untill pandav putra get older for the crown…dhristrastra was also not the permanent king…and duryodhan was selfish so, he was not even the second option…and talking about my god krishna then…his leela with others where related to their past karmas…u bloody fool don’t even know ur current birth satus and is trying to judge lord…krishna did mahabharat to change treta yug to kalyug….karna never did a mistake acording to krishna also…but krishna was testing him…….

      • sagardroy says:

        Praveen, it’s Ratnesh opinion or rather interpretation, please don’t go personal here, don’t call somebody mad or bloody fool. I am agreeing with you with what you said about the mahabharata but please as a true believer of Krishna, please don’t write rude words cause lord krishna will be disrespected because of people like you.

      • Niloy says:

        You, Pravin, may be u don’t know Mahabharat or u did’t understand. Better go through Mahabharat once more and try to understand from your view point. and try to justify yourself. If u really understand then u will never use such dirty words against some one. this is better to be an agnostic than a hypocrite. And u should know that “too much courtesy, full of craft”

      • Prateekshit Deb says:

        Pravin, If you really are such a big devotee of krishna and read Mahabharata you would at least have the courtesy to speak like a learned person and not some uncouth thug. If you truly read mahabharata all the points stated above by ratnesh are true. There is no absolute evil or absolute good but only a matter of perspective. Don’t act like you know everything just by knowing Mahabharata as a childhood story. Remove your ignorance and truly study the epic that is Mahabharata and not the Amar Chitra Katha edition.

  3. Niraj says:

    Soirry if I am sounding a little persistant. but eagerly awaiting reply for my query.

  4. as a matter of fact guys,only 20% of Mahabharata has been known to everyone or to the world.However rest 80% were not disclosed and were burnt during ashoka empire fearing the consequences.So lets not argue on the insight.Mahabharat is such a mystery that to unravel it,you would need a lifetime dedication and infact impossible to explore it.Only two architects, Lord Ganesha and Ved Vyasa know the complete insight.

    • Niraj says:

      radha krishnaji could you kindly tell me the source of your info.

    • sagardroy says:

      Radha Krishna, bro what u just wrote(only “and were burnt during ashoka empire fearing the consequences”) i understood u took it as an information from the novel “The Mahabharata Secret” by Christopher C Doyle. I understand that may be all of Mahabharata that we know might not be 100%, i can agree because its so much old and many kings of ancient India may have changed and modified it but please don’t write that Ashoka removed 80%. If i am wrong about your comment then please clarify and give atleast a source as Niraj asked, and also i don’t undertand why people write like they know everything but there is no reply when asked about the source.

    • sagardroy says:

      also, i want to know did u understood Mahabharata? i am writing(typing) this because you wrote “you would need a lifetime dedication and infact impossible to explore it.”
      You used the word “you”, so it’s obvious that only you know everything. if you don’t then u should have used word “we”.

  5. alok says:

    Mahabharat is only a written story till date because it happened a long time ago. There is no surety that it is absolutely right whatever is written in it.
    It is human tendency they make the things matter biggest as per their assumptions or emotions. Present mahabharat found in scriptures has been subject to change time by time by humans own interest as they want regarding this. I think many of the story are not 100% true or we don’t know the actual fact behind them. So we can’t say whatever was right or wrong absolutely.
    So I suggest you all don’t blame anyone let the things and time passed away and do your duty with 100% truth for avoiding this type of war in future.

  6. JD MIN says:

    Reblogged this on Book & Tapestry and commented:
    This is some of the food I am eating. Thank you.

  7. pallavi82 says:

    i found some interesting facts about Karna and Krishna here. well, this is just speculations. I mean we know that nobody can ever know this epic completely because to some it is just a story to some it’s one of the greatest epics of the times, and to some, it doesn’t exist! (non-believers)
    i got my material as i am writing a short story on these two personalities.

  8. sanjana14 says:

    See everything is fine but Draupadi never loved karna.
    Do you think Krishna swayam Narayan will let injustice happen by making her marry Arjun.
    No she might have lived Arjun more than other Pandavas which is natural for he won her swayam war. For sure she didn’t love karn

  9. vinay says:

    With respect I don’t want to create any offenses just sharing my views… Mahabharata is a sure epic and I do believed it might have occurred but I feel that we should not judge the characters
    Like kunti for hiding truth,karn for fighting against pandavas,draupadi for being arrogant at some points.etc. because what we get from Mahabharata is just Ved vyas narration basically we read vyas’s point of view on the event of Mahabharata. It’s same like a reporter presenting a news some facts and more of exaggeration I m sorry if you don’t agree but people always add some exaggeration to make to story interesting.. accordingly vyas was just trying to give us more of morals and values rather than advance facts about how were the people what was the commoners lifes. Etc.

Leave a comment